Physics of the Universe an Introduction to God
E = mc²
Written by
Michael Craig Clark
Preface
“The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is
the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good
as dead: his eyes are closed."
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility."
“The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is
comprehensible."
“People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction
between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
From Collected Quotes of
Albert Einstein
Recently Stephen William Hawking, a profound
physics genius of our generation, raised issue to the question as to whether
the universe was spontaneously created, thus suggesting that there would be no
need for God for the Universe and creation to come about. With this idea, I
personally do not believe Steve Hawking is just trying to sell books as many
are assuming. Dr. Hawking has led a very
precarious life, to say the least, not only in his physical maladies, but his
intellect and research to find the answers to life. Like seekers of the past,
this man again comes to the threshold of creation’s very existence and knocks
on God's door, attempting to see if anyone is home. Are his inquiries so much
different than us all in our desire to find answers? Some of us, like Steve,
are given great gifts in this quest for those answers. What Mr. Hawking may not
realize is that he, as such a profound individual, is, in himself, a very
testimony to the fact that a great intelligence is behind it all. It's nice to
have faith, but faith without substance is empty and people like Steve realize
this. This very fact is what drives the seekers, like Stephen Hawking, to find
answers and thankfully, the Creator provides to us such men, because they are a
blessing in disguise causing all of us to challenge the integrity of our own
belief systems.
Anytime someone of this magnitude raises his
head on such a profound subject, obviously it's going to cause great concern,
and with me, I am very challenged to address this issue. All throughout history
great minds, like that of Hawking, have tried to contemplate, relative to
scientific evaluations, existence as we as humans evaluate it. Given the
limited view allotted by our perception of life, and what is around us by
interpretation and structured guidance by those evaluations handed down along
with contemporary views, we grapple with a formidable structure hoping it will
prove the big three. First, how we got here? Secondly, why we are
here? And third and more importantly, where are we headed in the future, if
indeed there is one? There is a basic challenge that arises within our society
when evaluating the answers to these questions when contemplating Science
versus Religion. I say, “versus,” because until now, the two seem to be incompatible,
creating the great divide that seemingly cannot be traversed one to the other.
Why? Like anything in
life, it all comes down to the preponderance
of the evidence in evaluating anything, and when it comes to the universe,
creation, and what we perceive about us, there is no difference. It all must be
judged by our comprehension of things as we are given senses to perceive them.
As humans we are aware of the basic five, with some claiming extras, but again,
with what evidence to prove such? This is where we differ from scientific
evaluations and begin to consider things we can't perceive with the basic five,
something most call “faith” or religion. If faith is to be proven
scientifically, it must be based upon substance and something not ethereal or
theoretical. Anything, whether in sciences or religion, must be proven or it remains
theoretical and possibly spurious or frivolous. So, the BIG question
is, as Hawking has pointed out: Does God
exist at all, and if so, where is He in relation to creation, our existence and
our comprehension of that existence? In other words, millions of people profess
a belief that God exists, to say nothing of the hundreds of millions having
gone on before us alleging the same view. However, where are the proofs of
God's existence and which one of them can disprove Dr. Hawking’s findings?
Absolutes can only be arrived upon with a
finished product. Can we say the creation is finished, in order to give it a
proper evaluation as Hawking is attempting to do? Then it comes down to the
age-old adage of ‘chicken or egg’ not knowing the blueprint. Who's to know if
we have arrived at the end or is it that we are at the beginning of creation?
Is the creation an on-going, never-ending process we perceive as children
sitting in front of a movie screen as it is played out before us? Could it be
we are not really participants at all, but only imagining we are written into
the script, perceiving ourselves, as we would like to see ourselves, the heroes
portrayed before our eyes as they are presented upon the screen? Do we, or
anything for that matter, really exist or is it just a twilight zone from which
we may or may not awaken? You see it gets deep, real deep and anyone, scientist
or theologian, should stop and consider those questions before trying to tangle
with the question Hawking has raised.
Throughout decades and
even centuries, the long-standing awareness of the universe has been to see it
as a rational, intelligent design, and during the last century, with the Theory of Relativity, Einstein has
pretty much proven it so. However, coming alongside of that idea we have a more
contemporary challenge called, Quantum
Theory or Quantum Mechanics. With these theories and their evaluations,
many have been brought, within the scientific community, to accept the idea
that the universe is not rational at all but random, giving credibility to the Theory of Probability and expanding upon
the Quanta vision with other theories like that of String Theory, M Theory just to name a few. All of this has led to
the acceptance of, not only the idea that the Universe spontaneously creates
itself, but that other universes exist with possible travel to each one through
galactic passages called wormholes.
For the record, the
challenge to disprove this modern-day interpretation of the Theory of Quantum Mechanics constantly
hung before Einstein until the day of his death. It has been said that his
objective in this battle, during his later years, was to come up with the “Theory of Everything,” thereby
overriding all other theories and thus dispelling these ideas, evolving out of
this Quantum Theory debacle, which he
viewed as absolutely wrong. Einstein concluded with his belief that the
Universe was nothing less than rational by design.
“I am convinced that
He (God) does not play dice.”
“Occurrences in this
domain are beyond the reach of exact prediction because of the variety of factors
in operation, not because of any lack of order in nature.”
Albert Einstein
In my attempt to pick
up where Albert Einstein left off in his endeavor to find that, seemingly
unattainable, Theory of Everything
and in contrast to the many varied ideas which have sprung from the misuse of Quantization, I propose to prove, among
other things, that the Laws of
Relativity, Gravity and Infinite Parallel Magnetism, along with the Law of Convergence, taken in conjunction
with Dynamic Balance of Equilibrium,
is what will bring the Universe into Harmonic Balance thus, unequivocally,
further proving that creation cannot spontaneously start itself on a finite
spectrum. Along with that, I will further reaffirm that matter cannot
be annihilated but only changes form, showing what is, has always been, along
with the fact that the Universe is not expanding as has long been assumed, and
that time and space, as we perceive it, is only an illusion of reality. I will
confirm that an ‘atom’ cannot be created, but only divided with the fact that
procreation occurs by convergence, regenerating only that which always was by
reformation not duplicity, thus establishing the fact that an ‘atom’ cannot be
created but only divided. Moreover, I will prove to the world that the general physics
of the Universe are the very expressions of the Designer Himself, and the
intelligent design behind it all, is nothing less than the Executive Program,
bringing to life that which, otherwise, could be considered nothing more than
animated simulations on a grand computer screen.
In all fairness, we
will examine these many concepts of modern science to see if spontaneous
creation exists, realizing if it did, that it would be possible to create a new
‘atom’ and thus another Universe, as is being alleged with this modern ‘shill’
game, called Quantum Theory or the Theory of Chances. In conclusion to this
great challenge, I will show with absolute, tangible proof with substance as
well as practical application, the theory sought by Einstein, that of the ‘Theory
of Everything’ and its mathematical Quantified equation. In doing so, I will
bring to light the age-old Mystery of the understanding to life desired by all
that have ever existed, that of the reason for life itself, the universe,
creation and how and more importantly, why, while answering the quandary, ‘IF’
we are really here at all.
To digest these thoughts, over the next few
pages we will examine closely what is being said. My approach to these profound
subjects is purposely kept simple to reach the masses and not just a select few
‘know it all’ intellectuals. For this purpose, I am not highly educated by
academic standards, nor do I claim to compete with those who are. I just share
my views as, by inspiration, they are given to me. A good teacher approaches
his subject in a manner that his student will understand, but one who thinks he
can teach yet, leaves the student behind, is in the wrong field of work. With
this in mind, I approach this vast undertaking with the thoughts left to us
again, by Albert Einstein.
“If you can't explain
it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
“Most of the
fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be
expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone.”
“It should be possible
to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid.”
Albert Einstein
Understanding that the
search for truth takes many avenues, Physics and Religion top the list. All
seemingly born into this prison of ignorance, those of us not institutionalized
to its confinement, desire our release by searching for the way out. Whether by
faith or knowledge we, as those having gone on before us, suffer with the
reality we perceive in our everyday existence, along with the centuries-old
question of how to find peace and happiness in it. At the heart of these questions we find, not
only the answer to world peace, but the solution to bringing harmony and unity
within our personal existence. Meeting this, ‘rubber to the road’ evidence, is
what is lacking in most endeavors when evaluating the universe about us and our
very existence in it. Admittedly, many religions of faith have claimed the
answers, but like any theory, who has accomplished this evidentiary proof? Without this objective in our search, our
efforts remain futile, only leading to more despondency of being confined to
its ‘Box’, never able to escape.
So, . . . what is the
mystery of this great escape? Contrary to the cold, calculated findings within
the scientific community, as well as the frivolous views of religion this,
along with other mysteries of the universe and its purpose, will be our
objective answers in this dissertation, thus disclosing the “Theory of
Everything,” the Executive Program, if you will, sought for by Albert Einstein
when he said,
“I want to know how
God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the
spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts. The rest are
details.”
Chapter 1: Finite to Infinite Awareness