Physics of the Universe an Introduction to God
E = mc²
Michael Craig Clark
“The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility."
“The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible."
“People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
From Collected Quotes of Albert Einstein
Recently Stephen William Hawking, a profound physics genius of our generation, raised issue to the question as to whether the universe was spontaneously created, thus suggesting that there would be no need for God for the Universe and creation to come about. With this idea, I personally do not believe Steve Hawking is just trying to sell books as many are assuming. Dr. Hawking has led a very precarious life, to say the least, not only in his physical maladies, but his intellect and research to find the answers to life. Like seekers of the past, this man again comes to the threshold of creation’s very existence and knocks on God's door, attempting to see if anyone is home. Are his inquiries so much different than us all in our desire to find answers? Some of us, like Steve, are given great gifts in this quest for those answers. What Mr. Hawking may not realize is that he, as such a profound individual, is, in himself, a very testimony to the fact that a great intelligence is behind it all. It's nice to have faith, but faith without substance is empty and people like Steve realize this. This very fact is what drives the seekers, like Stephen Hawking, to find answers and thankfully, the Creator provides to us such men, because they are a blessing in disguise causing all of us to challenge the integrity of our own belief systems.
Anytime someone of this magnitude raises his head on such a profound subject, obviously it's going to cause great concern, and with me, I am very challenged to address this issue. All throughout history great minds, like that of Hawking, have tried to contemplate, relative to scientific evaluations, existence as we as humans evaluate it. Given the limited view allotted by our perception of life, and what is around us by interpretation and structured guidance by those evaluations handed down along with contemporary views, we grapple with a formidable structure hoping it will prove the big three. First, how we got here? Secondly, why we are here? And third and more importantly, where are we headed in the future, if indeed there is one? There is a basic challenge that arises within our society when evaluating the answers to these questions when contemplating Science versus Religion. I say, “versus,” because until now, the two seem to be incompatible, creating the great divide that seemingly cannot be traversed one to the other.
Why? Like anything in life, it all comes down to the preponderance of the evidence in evaluating anything, and when it comes to the universe, creation, and what we perceive about us, there is no difference. It all must be judged by our comprehension of things as we are given senses to perceive them. As humans we are aware of the basic five, with some claiming extras, but again, with what evidence to prove such? This is where we differ from scientific evaluations and begin to consider things we can't perceive with the basic five, something most call “faith” or religion. If faith is to be proven scientifically, it must be based upon substance and something not ethereal or theoretical. Anything, whether in sciences or religion, must be proven or it remains theoretical and possibly spurious or frivolous. So, the BIG question is, as Hawking has pointed out: Does God exist at all, and if so, where is He in relation to creation, our existence and our comprehension of that existence? In other words, millions of people profess a belief that God exists, to say nothing of the hundreds of millions having gone on before us alleging the same view. However, where are the proofs of God's existence and which one of them can disprove Dr. Hawking’s findings?
Absolutes can only be arrived upon with a finished product. Can we say the creation is finished, in order to give it a proper evaluation as Hawking is attempting to do? Then it comes down to the age-old adage of ‘chicken or egg’ not knowing the blueprint. Who's to know if we have arrived at the end or is it that we are at the beginning of creation? Is the creation an on-going, never-ending process we perceive as children sitting in front of a movie screen as it is played out before us? Could it be we are not really participants at all, but only imagining we are written into the script, perceiving ourselves, as we would like to see ourselves, the heroes portrayed before our eyes as they are presented upon the screen? Do we, or anything for that matter, really exist or is it just a twilight zone from which we may or may not awaken? You see it gets deep, real deep and anyone, scientist or theologian, should stop and consider those questions before trying to tangle with the question Hawking has raised.
Throughout decades and even centuries, the long-standing awareness of the universe has been to see it as a rational, intelligent design, and during the last century, with the Theory of Relativity, Einstein has pretty much proven it so. However, coming alongside of that idea we have a more contemporary challenge called, Quantum Theory or Quantum Mechanics. With these theories and their evaluations, many have been brought, within the scientific community, to accept the idea that the universe is not rational at all but random, giving credibility to the Theory of Probability and expanding upon the Quanta vision with other theories like that of String Theory, M Theory just to name a few. All of this has led to the acceptance of, not only the idea that the Universe spontaneously creates itself, but that other universes exist with possible travel to each one through galactic passages called wormholes.
For the record, the challenge to disprove this modern-day interpretation of the Theory of Quantum Mechanics constantly hung before Einstein until the day of his death. It has been said that his objective in this battle, during his later years, was to come up with the “Theory of Everything,” thereby overriding all other theories and thus dispelling these ideas, evolving out of this Quantum Theory debacle, which he viewed as absolutely wrong. Einstein concluded with his belief that the Universe was nothing less than rational by design.
“I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice.”
“Occurrences in this domain are beyond the reach of exact prediction because of the variety of factors in operation, not because of any lack of order in nature.”
In my attempt to pick up where Albert Einstein left off in his endeavor to find that, seemingly unattainable, Theory of Everything and in contrast to the many varied ideas which have sprung from the misuse of Quantization, I propose to prove, among other things, that the Laws of Relativity, Gravity and Infinite Parallel Magnetism, along with the Law of Convergence, taken in conjunction with Dynamic Balance of Equilibrium, is what will bring the Universe into Harmonic Balance thus, unequivocally, further proving that creation cannot spontaneously start itself on a finite spectrum. Along with that, I will further reaffirm that matter cannot be annihilated but only changes form, showing what is, has always been, along with the fact that the Universe is not expanding as has long been assumed, and that time and space, as we perceive it, is only an illusion of reality. I will confirm that an ‘atom’ cannot be created, but only divided with the fact that procreation occurs by convergence, regenerating only that which always was by reformation not duplicity, thus establishing the fact that an ‘atom’ cannot be created but only divided. Moreover, I will prove to the world that the general physics of the Universe are the very expressions of the Designer Himself, and the intelligent design behind it all, is nothing less than the Executive Program, bringing to life that which, otherwise, could be considered nothing more than animated simulations on a grand computer screen.
In all fairness, we will examine these many concepts of modern science to see if spontaneous creation exists, realizing if it did, that it would be possible to create a new ‘atom’ and thus another Universe, as is being alleged with this modern ‘shill’ game, called Quantum Theory or the Theory of Chances. In conclusion to this great challenge, I will show with absolute, tangible proof with substance as well as practical application, the theory sought by Einstein, that of the ‘Theory of Everything’ and its mathematical Quantified equation. In doing so, I will bring to light the age-old Mystery of the understanding to life desired by all that have ever existed, that of the reason for life itself, the universe, creation and how and more importantly, why, while answering the quandary, ‘IF’ we are really here at all.
To digest these thoughts, over the next few pages we will examine closely what is being said. My approach to these profound subjects is purposely kept simple to reach the masses and not just a select few ‘know it all’ intellectuals. For this purpose, I am not highly educated by academic standards, nor do I claim to compete with those who are. I just share my views as, by inspiration, they are given to me. A good teacher approaches his subject in a manner that his student will understand, but one who thinks he can teach yet, leaves the student behind, is in the wrong field of work. With this in mind, I approach this vast undertaking with the thoughts left to us again, by Albert Einstein.
“If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.”
“Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone.”
“It should be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid.”
Understanding that the search for truth takes many avenues, Physics and Religion top the list. All seemingly born into this prison of ignorance, those of us not institutionalized to its confinement, desire our release by searching for the way out. Whether by faith or knowledge we, as those having gone on before us, suffer with the reality we perceive in our everyday existence, along with the centuries-old question of how to find peace and happiness in it. At the heart of these questions we find, not only the answer to world peace, but the solution to bringing harmony and unity within our personal existence. Meeting this, ‘rubber to the road’ evidence, is what is lacking in most endeavors when evaluating the universe about us and our very existence in it. Admittedly, many religions of faith have claimed the answers, but like any theory, who has accomplished this evidentiary proof? Without this objective in our search, our efforts remain futile, only leading to more despondency of being confined to its ‘Box’, never able to escape.
So, . . . what is the mystery of this great escape? Contrary to the cold, calculated findings within the scientific community, as well as the frivolous views of religion this, along with other mysteries of the universe and its purpose, will be our objective answers in this dissertation, thus disclosing the “Theory of Everything,” the Executive Program, if you will, sought for by Albert Einstein when he said,
“I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts. The rest are details.”