NATURE OF
MOTION / PETITION
The Petitioner herewith respectfully
Moves this Honorable
Supreme Court, Ex parte by Motion and Petitions
for a Court Ordered (Prohibitory Injunction) for the purpose of securing his
personal property currently located within the Jurisdiction and under the
sovereign judicial authority of this most high court relative to the following:
FACTS OF THE
PETITION
1.
Within Israel exists the
property, that of Har Ha-Moriyya (Har Ha-Bayit)
understood to be the TEMPLE MOUNT and site of King Solomon's Great Temple which
construction began in the second month of the fourth year
of Solomon's reign.
2.
The property remains within and
marked out by ancient and contemporary landmarks and boundaries on the West by HaKotel HaMa'aravi (Western
Wall); and on the East by Sha'ar Ha Rahamim (Golden Gate); on the South by Ophel;
and on the North by the Sheep Gate and Antonia Fortress.
3.
This property, as a matter of
accurate historical record, was purchased by King Solomon's father, David
specifically at the request of the L-rd for the
building of Solomon's Temple.
4.
As a matter of the same
historical record the land in question was purchased by King David for six hundred shekels of gold from a man by the name Ornan,
a Jebusite from a tribe of the Canaanite people ruling the city of Jerusalem
known as the city of Jebus at that time.
5.
The land in question, at the
time of this transaction, was called (the threshing floor of Ornan) and also
understood by historical records to be that of "Mount
Moriah, where the L-rd appeared unto David and
commanded him to "set up an altar unto the L-rd." This same Mount
Moriah, being a mountain in the "land of Moriah," is also referred to
as the "Mountain of the L-rd" which is, by
primitive means of transportation, a reasonable three day journey from
Beer-Sheba where Abraham dwelt when he was instructed of the
L-rd to bring his "only Isaac" to this same
mount for sacrifice approximately nine hundred years earlier.
6.
As historical record bears out,
although contrary to many contemporary points of view, the land in question has
never changed legal ownership since it was lawfully purchased, with payment in
full of the fair market value, from Ornan the Jebusite by King David. Let it be
understood that at the same time David purchased the land for six hundred
shekels of gold he purchased for sacrificial offering Ornan's
oxen for fifty shekels of silver and the documented
historical record we presently have of that transaction must stand as a lawful
and binding contract unless proven otherwise.
7.
The significance of this site,
as so claimed, remains well documented throughout history even though the
original temple, built by Solomon on this site, was severely destroyed on the tenth day of the fifth month of the year 587-586 BCE. It
was restored in part by decree of Cyrus, King of Persia,
given in the first year of his reign, 539-538 BCE. History bears out that it
was refurbished under the reign of Herod the Great and continued to remain in
its same location during the time of Jesus the Nazarite and Josephus the Jewish
historian. Although the Temple was, for the most part,
destroyed by the Roman army under Titus in 70 CE and many different
"squatters" have taken up temporary residence on this piece of
property since that time, we reiterate once again that it has at no time
legally changed ownership since that original transaction cited herein between
David and Ornan.
8.
There remains on the property
at the present time several buildings, two of which are Islamic Mosques, one
built by Omar and completed in the year 691 CE; the other, Al-Aqsa, located at
the South end of the property in question, both of which have been built and
remain without lawful authority upon the said property. Although this fact may
be contested by many of those professing the Islamic Faith, there remains
within the records of the Islamic teachings of Muhammad, no record of a legal
transfer of this property, nor command by him to build upon this property any
such buildings as exist today. In fact, Muhammad, made it clear to his
followers, while he was alive, that this area was given by G-d to the Faithful
of Israel for a place of worship unlike other Holy sites in Islam which were
given to "all people." The "Qibla" and direction of worship
for Israel, since Solomon's Temple, has always been on this spot, known in
history as "The Mountain of the L-rd." Muhammad's teachings confirmed
this when he makes it clear that each of the three main religions from Abraham
have been given their own "Qibla" and direction
of worship. Muhammad's teachings also bear record
that this particular piece of land was considered a Holy
site to Israel long before he was ever born or the Qur'an revealed,
therefore to claim a religious right by some kind of spiritual significance
would not become legally binding nor override the lawful contract made nearly
1600 years earlier.
9.
The plaintiff Michael,
Israel's Great Prince, ordained by G-d to stand for them in their time of
trouble which presently exists, herewith moves with this claim against all
unauthorized persons found to be trespassing and or conspiring to trespass and
or take possession of without the owner's permission, his privately owned
property granted to him through heirship from Israel's King David, the son of
Jesse and the father of Israel's King Solomon as outlined and described in the
aforesaid.
Solemnly affirmed and
respectfully submitted this 1st day of Nisan, being April 1, 2014.
Signature
_________________________
Michael Craig Clark
a/k/a
GREAT PRINCE MICHAEL
P.O. Box 121
Hertford, NC 27944-0121
Actual Case Document
Daily Monitored Contact:
pmdetmer@gmail.com
Webmaster and Assistant to Plaintiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Individual GIF Photos of Case Pages
Case Page One
Case Page Two
Case Page Three
Case Page Four